part one:
I see myself in art history as an artist that went against the norm, such as in the preface that we read, against the guild. I believe I fit into this category because I set the bar for my work, what I want to accomplish and when. I choose the subject matter I want to shoot, and the message that a piece may have behind it. I wouldn’t have taken rules from the guild in order to become a “master” in someone else’s’ eyes. Part of the thrill of working in art is messing up and making mistakes. Without them I wouldn’t be able to recognize a good piece when I made one.
I’m the only person that can push myself to get work done. Knowing what I can accomplish drives me to want to set the bar even higher for myself, which makes my standards towards my artwork change numerous times. If I were told to only do so much to a piece, it would be difficult for me to just do that and nothing else, even if I felt driven to do so. Their standards would deviate me from mine, causing one or the other to be unhappy with the outcome.
I create and choose the way I want to express myself through art. I get to choose between painting, drawing, sculpture, or photography. Being told to only do one just because it’s what someone wants wouldn’t sit with me well. Through trial and error I know which medium I’m strongest in, and feel as though I can express myself in the best. It is because of my persistence through trial and error that I have gotten to become the artist I am today.
part two:
I create art in order to show others how my perception of the world may be different from what they see. Behind each picture is a deeper meaning. The meaning may differ from person to person, but my main objective is to create art that I’m proud of, and reflects whatever emotion I was feeling at the time it was shot.
I create art to show others the way I percieve things.